首页> 外文OA文献 >The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
【2h】

The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent

机译:无法可靠地确定欲望的真实性:对知情同意的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare.
机译:有时有人争辩说,自主决策需要决策者的愿望是真实的,即“真正”,“真正地属于自己”,“不合情理”或类似。在本文中,有人提出不能开发一种可靠地确定欲望的真实性(或不真实性)的方法。引入了由不同真实性理论显示的特征分类法,并将其应用于对这些理论进行分类评估,这与先前对它们进行单独处理的方法相反。得出的结论是,在实践中,欲望的真实性无法可靠地确定。因此建议在医疗保健的知情同意实践中不应采用真实性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ahlin, Jesper;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号